1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MENDOZA v. CATE
 

MENDOZA v. CATE

No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DAD P.

ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

July 29, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arquimedes Mendoza, Petitioner, represented by Michael Bradley Bigelow, Law Office of Michael B. Bigelow.

Matthew Cate, Respondent, represented by Brian George Smiley, Office Of The Attorney General & Justain Paul Riley, Attorney General's Office for the State of California.

ORDER

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner's April 26, 2013 motion entitled "Application and Request to Subpoena Witness Take Depositions and Other Discovery; Request to Modify Briefing Schedule" came on for hearing on July 26, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned. Although petitioner's motion was scheduled for hearing pursuant to court order dated March 27, 2013, both counsel for petitioner and counsel for respondent failed to appear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases