1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 956 F.Supp.2d
  5. 956 F.Supp.2d 316 (2013)
 

U.S. v. ORTHOFIX, INC.

Criminal Action No. 12-10169-WGY, 12-10374-WGY.

956 F.Supp.2d 316 (2013)

UNITED STATES of America, v. ORTHOFIX, INC., Defendant. United States of America, v. APTx Vehicle Systems Limited, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

July 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Schumacher, Jeremy M. Sternberg, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for United States of America.

Brien T. O'Connor, Kirsten V. Mayer, Nicholas J. Linder, Andrew O'Connor, Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

For seventeen years, this Court unconstitutionally sentenced offenders in accordance with an oxymoron — mandatory guidelines. Even after the Supreme Court finally put paid to this practice, United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and recalled district judges to their duty to exercise wise discretion in sentencing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases