1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 951 F.Supp.2d
  5. 951 F.Supp.2d 159 (2013)
 

SISSEL v. U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Civil Action No. 10-1263 (BAH).

951 F.Supp.2d 159 (2013)

Matthew SISSEL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 28, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore Hadzi-Antich, Alan E. Deserio, Daniel A. Himebaugh, Luke A. Wake, Paul J. Beard, II, Timothy Sandefur, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff.

Scott Risner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is a facial constitutional challenge to 26 U.S.C. § 5000A, which is the requirement to maintain minimum essential insurance coverage contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended. The plaintiff, Matthew Sissel, complains that this minimum coverage provision — commonly referred to as the "individual mandate" — is unconstitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases