1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 950 F.Supp.2d
  5. 950 F.Supp.2d 949 (2013)
 

U.S. v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Case No. 3:99-CV-093.

950 F.Supp.2d 949 (2013)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

June 17, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan S. Gale, Dennis L. Phillips, Michael F. Hertz, Stephen D. Altman, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Dale Ann Goldberg, Pamela M. Stanek, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff.

Brian C. Elmer, David Z. Bodenheimer, Peter B. Work, Richard L. Beizer, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, David Carr Greer, James H. Greer, Bieser, Greer & Landis, Dayton, OH, Fred H. Bartlit, Hamilton H. Hill, Jeffrey A. Hall, Michael J. Valaik, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action is before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. After a bench trial, this Court rejected Defendant United Technologies Corporation's assertion of a statute of limitations defense and found it liable on the United States' claims arising under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1) & (2),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases