1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. v. BOOKER
 

U.S. v. BOOKER

Criminal File No. 1:11-CR-255-1-TWT.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. QUENTIN BOOKER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

June 13, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Quentin Booker, Defendant, Pro Se.

Quentin Booker, Defendant, represented by Bruce S. Harvey , Law Office of Bruce Harvey.

Veronica Bullard, Defendant, Pro Se.

Veronica Bullard, Defendant, represented by Daniel Kane , Office of Daniel Kane.

Stacey Dooley, Defendant, Pro Se.

Stacey Dooley, Defendant, represented by Paul Stephen Kish , Kish & Lietz. P.C..

Ashley Henderson, Defendant, Pro Se.

Ashley Henderson, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey Lyn Ertel , Federal Defender Program Inc., Jimmy Hardy , Federal Defender Program Inc. & Stephen Patrick Johnson , Federal Defender Program Inc..

Edwin Thornton, Defendant, Pro Se.

Edwin Thornton, Defendant, represented by William Allman Morrison , Jones Morrison & Womack, PC.

Ronny Little, Defendant, Pro Se.

Ronny Little, Defendant, represented by John R. Lovell , John R. Lovell, Esq., P.C..

Desiree Jones, Defendant, Pro Se.

Desiree Jones, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey H. Brickman , Jeffrey H. Brickman, LLC.

Derrick Powell, Defendant, Pro Se.

Derrick Powell, Defendant, represented by David H. Jones , David H. Jones, Esq. Attorney at Law.

Michael Johnson, Defendant, Pro Se.

Michael Johnson, Defendant, represented by Stephen Patrick Johnson , Federal Defender Program Inc. & William H. Thomas, Jr. , The W.H. Thomas Firm, LLC.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Dahil Dueno Goss , Office of United States Attorney, Jill E. Steinberg , U.S. Attorneys Office, Mary F. Kruger , U.S. Attorney's Office & Tracia M. King , U.S. Attorneys Office.

ORDER

THOMAS W. THRASH, Jr., District Judge.

This is a criminal action in which the Defendants seek to suppress evidence derived from orders authorizing law enforcement to obtain cell site information on the Defendants' telephones. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 486] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendants' Motions to Suppress [Doc. 207, 210 & 388]. The Magistrate Judge did not err in failing to hold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases