1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 957 F.Supp.2d
  5. 957 F.Supp.2d 277 (2013)
 

CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RET. SYS. v. KINROSS GOLD CORP.

No. 12 Civ. 1203(PAE).

957 F.Supp.2d 277 (2013)

CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION, Tye W. Burt, Paul H. Barry, Glen Masterman, and Kenneth G. Thomas, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Opinion Denying Reconsideration June 6, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Seidman, Laurence Jesse Hasson, Michael S. Bigin, Bernstein Liebhard, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

Matthew Alexander Schwartz, Robert Joseph Giuffra, Jr., Thomas William Walsh, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.

OPINION & ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge.

In this putative class action, lead plaintiff City of Austin Police Retirement System ("Austin") claims that defendants Kinross Gold Corporation ("Kinross" or the "Company") and four individual Kinross officers violated §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a), and the United States Securities and Exchange...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases