1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
 

PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Case No. 2:12-cv-00665-KJD-PAL.

PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

March 13, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by Brian E. Holthus , Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish, Lewis K Loss , Loss, Judge & Ward, LLP, Matthew J Dendinger , Loss, Judge & Ward, LLP & Tyler Nichols Ure , Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Defendant, represented by Anthony W Kirkwood , Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP, David Mullin , Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP & Stanley W Parry , Ballard Spahr LLP.

Corey L. Johnson, Defendant, represented by Jessica K Peterson , Flangas McMillan Law Group & John R. McMillan , Flangas McMillan Law Group.

Douglas E French, Defendant, represented by Brett A. Axelrod , FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, Eric E Reed , Fox Rothschild LLP & Patrick J Egan , Fox Rothschild LLP.

Gary A. Gardner, Defendant, represented by Allen D. Emmel , Emmel & Klegerman PC.

Timothy S. Kirby, Defendant, represented by Grace E Rebling , Osborn Maledon, Martha J. Ashcraft , Law Offices of Martha J. Ashcraft & Maureen Beyers , Osborn Maledon, P.A..

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Anthony W Kirkwood , Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP, David Mullin , Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP & Stanley W Parry , Ballard Spahr LLP.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Brian E. Holthus , Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish, Lewis K Loss , Loss, Judge & Ward, LLP & Matthew J Dendinger , Loss, Judge & Ward, LLP.

ORDER

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Silver State Bank's Motion to Enforce this Court's Discovery Order, Agreed ESI Protocol, and Motion to Compel the Production of Documents (Dkt. ##130, 132, 134). The court has considered the moving and responsive papers (Dkt. ##138, 134) and the arguments of counsel. At the hearing conducted February 25, 2014, the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases