1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 923 F.Supp.2d
  5. 923 F.Supp.2d 696 (2013)
 

CRADLE IP, LLC v. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC.

Civ. No. 11-1254-SLR.

923 F.Supp.2d 696 (2013)

CRADLE IP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

February 13, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Crawford, Esquire and Chad S.C. Stover, Esquire of Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff. Of Counsel: Charles W. Saber, Esquire and Robert G. Gingher, Esquire of Dickstein Shapiro LLP.

Jeffrey L. Moyer, Esquire, Kelly E. Farnan, Esquire, and Jason J. Rawnsley, Esquire of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, for Defendant. Of Counsel: Robert T. Haslam, Esquire, Anupam Sharma, Esquire, Christopher Longman, Esquire, and Jilliam Willis, Esquire of Covington & Burling LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On December 16, 2011, plaintiff Cradle IP, LLC ("Cradle IP") filed this patent infringement action against defendant Texas Instruments, Inc. ("TI"). In its complaint, Cradle IP alleges that certain TI Multicore Digital Signal Processes, Microprocessors, and OMAP devices ("the accused products") infringe three of Cradle IP's patents: U.S. Patent No. 6,874,049; U.S. Patent No. 6...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases