1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 983 F.Supp.2d
  5. 983 F.Supp.2d 22 (2013)
 

GEIER v. CONWAY, HOMER & CHIN-CAPLAN, P.C.

Civil Action No. 12-1171 (RMC).

983 F.Supp.2d 22 (2013)

Mark R. GEIER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONWAY, HOMER & CHIN-CAPLAN, P.C., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 8, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Klimaski, Klimaski & Associates, P.C., Washington, DC, James M. Love, Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Love, Dickman & McCalmon, PC, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiffs.

Keith M. Bonner, Mark Alden Schofield, Bonner, Kieman, Trebach & Crociata, LLP, Elizabeth H. Mykytiuk, Pamela Anne Bresnahan, Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, Dennis John Quinn, Carr Maloney PC, Washington, DC, Robert W. Hesselbacher, Jr., Meighan G. Burton, Wright, Constable & Skeen, LLP, Baltimore, MD, for Defendants.

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Dr. Mark Geier and his son, David, brought suit seeking payment for consulting services rendered. Defendants are four law firms: Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan; John H. Kim & Associates, P.C.; Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P.A.; and Williams, Kherkher, Hart & Boundas LLP (collectively, the Law Firms). The Geiers allege that a committee of attorneys, including the Law Firms, retained the Geiers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases