1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 910 F.Supp.2d
  5. 910 F.Supp.2d 850 (2012)
 

SUFFOLK TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. AOL INC.

Case No. 1:12cv625.

910 F.Supp.2d 850 (2012)

SUFFOLK TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. AOL INC. and Google Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

December 7, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig Crandall Reilly, Law Office of Craig C. Reilly, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff.

Stephen Edward Noona, Kaufman & Canoles, P.C., Norfolk, VA, Erica Nicole Andersen, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, Matthew B. Chmiel, Kaufman & Canoles PC, Richmond, VA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.

This patent infringement suit presents the increasingly common, but always vexing jurisdictional question whether plaintiff, the assignee of the patent in issue, possesses "all substantial rights"1 to the patent, such that it has standing to sue putative infringers. More precisely, the question is whether plaintiff Suffolk Technologies, LLC ("Suffolk"), the owner by assignment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases