1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ORTIZ v. BURNIAS
 

ORTIZ v. BURNIAS

No. 2:09-cv-01048 JWS.

ANIBAL ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. DONNA BURNIAS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

August 7, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anibal Ortiz, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Donna Burnias, Defendant, represented by Jamie Dennise Guzman , Struck Wieneke & Love PLC, Daniel Patrick Struck , Struck Wieneke & Love PLC & Rachel Love , Struck Wieneke & Love PLC.

ORDER AND OPINION

[Re: Motion at Docket 128]

JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.

I. MOTION PRESENTED

At docket 128, pro se plaintiff Anibal Ortiz ("plaintiff") moves for a bench warrant and for appointment of counsel. The court interprets the filing as a response to the court's order to show cause why plaintiff should not participate in his consolidated trial remotely and a request for issuance of a writ of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases