GREAT AMERICAN DUCK RACES, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
INTELLECTUAL SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Arizona.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 31, 2012.
July 31, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Great American Duck Races Incorporated, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff, represented by David Gary Barker , Snell & Wilmer LLP & Joseph G Adams , Snell & Wilmer LLP.
Unknown Spouse Dayan, named as: Jane Roe Dayan (wife of Maurice Dayan), Defendant, represented by John Charles Emerson Barrett , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson, Mark D Lammers , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson, Peter Bernard Goldman , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson & Glen M Diehl , Diehl Servilla.
Claypool Resources LLC, Defendant, represented by Peter Bernard Goldman , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson & Glen M Diehl , Diehl Servilla.
ASAP Sales LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Glen M Diehl , Diehl Servilla & Peter Bernard Goldman , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson.
Great American Duck Races Incorporated, an Arizona corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by David Gary Barker , Snell & Wilmer LLP & Joseph G Adams , Snell & Wilmer LLP.
Intellectual Solutions Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by John Charles Emerson Barrett , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson, Mark D Lammers , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson, Peter Bernard Goldman , DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC — Tucson & Glen M Diehl , Diehl Servilla.
Great American Duck Races Incorporated, an Arizona corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by David Gary Barker , Snell & Wilmer LLP & Joseph G Adams , Snell & Wilmer LLP.
United States District Court, D. Arizona.
ORDER AND OPINION
[Re: Motion at Docket 14]
JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.
I. MOTION PRESENTED
At docket 14, defendants Intellectual Solutions, Inc. ("Intellectual Solutions"), Claypool Resources, LLC ("Claypool"), Mervin Dayan, Vivian Dayan, Maurice Dayan, and Jennifer Dayan (collectively "defendants") move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
