UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel. MICHAEL YARBERRY, Plaintiffs,
v.
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KMART, INC., Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. Illinois.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 25, 2012.
July 25, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
USA, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Gerald M. Burke , Assistant U.S. Attorney — Fairview Heights & Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of California, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Florida, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Illinois, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Indiana, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Louisiana, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Michigan, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Nevada, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of New Hampshire, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of New Jersey, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of New Mexico, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of New York, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Texas, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Virginia, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
State of Wisconsin, ex rel, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy Keller , Aschemann Keller, LLC.
United States District Court, S.D. Illinois.
ORDER
MICHAEL J. REAGAN, District Judge.
This qui tam False Claims action pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3279, et seq., was filed by the relator, Michael Yarberry, on August 3, 2009 (Doc. 2). After multiple extensions of the 60-day period within which the government may intervene, the United States elected not to intervene in this action, as is its right under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4). United States Magistrate Judge...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
