KINTER v. BOLTZ

Case No. 3:12-cv-85.

BRIAN L. KINTER, Plaintiff, v. JENISE L. BOLTZ, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton.

July 12, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian L Kinter, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Jenise L Boltz, Defendant, represented by Mark J Bamberger, The Mark Bamberger Co., LLC.

Champaign County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Relations-Juvenile-Probate Divisions, Defendant, represented by Mark David Landes, Isaac Brant Ledman & Teetor — 2 & A.J. Hensel, Isaac Brant Ledman & Teetor LLP.

Judge John C Newlin, Defendant, represented by Linda L Woeber, Montgomery Rennie & Jonson — 1 & Brian McAllum Spiess, Montgomery, Rennie & Jonson.

Judge Lori L Reisinger, Defendant, represented by Linda L Woeber, Montgomery Rennie & Jonson — 1 & Brian McAllum Spiess, Montgomery, Rennie & Jonson.

Magistrate Kristina M Lancaster, Defendant, represented by Mark David Landes, Isaac Brant Ledman & Teetor — 2 & A.J. Hensel, Isaac Brant Ledman & Teetor LLP.

Attorney Linda MacGillivary, Defendant, represented by Robert Jerome Surdyk, Surdyk Dowd & Turner Co LPA.

Attorney Michael T Edwards, Defendant, represented by John Jason Pritchard & Mark J Bamberger, The Mark Bamberger Co., LLC.

Champaign County Child Support Enforcement Agency, Defendant, represented by Mark David Landes, Isaac Brant Ledman & Teetor — 2 & A.J. Hensel, Isaac Brant Ledman & Teetor LLP.

Ohio Attorney General, Defendant, represented by Michael Joseph Schuler, Ohio Attorney General & Aaron D Epstein, Ohio Attorney General's Office.

Jenise L Boltz, Counter Claimant, represented by Mark J Bamberger, The Mark Bamberger Co., LLC & Mark J Bamberger, The Mark Bamberger Co., LLC.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BE DISMISSED AND ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANT BOLTZ'S COUNTERCLAIMS

MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

This is a pro se action arising from a contentious family dispute in Champaign County, Ohio. Plaintiff is a father who was denied custody of one or more of his children. The appropriate course would have been for Plaintiff to challenge that decision in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases