DOE v. TYLINSKI

Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-00543.

JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, DONALD J. TYLINSKI, in his individual capacity and as Superintendent of Seneca Valley School District, MARK KORCINSKY, in his individual capacity and as Principal of Seneca Valley Senior High School, DENISE MANGANELLO, in her individual capacity and as Assistant Principal of Seneca Valley Senior High School, ALAN CUMO, in his individual capacity as Principal of Seneca Valley Intermediate High School, ROBERT RASO, in his individual capacity as Assistant Principal of Seneca Valley Intermediate High School, JOHN ROE and SUSAN ROE, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

July 9, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JANE DOE, Plaintiff, represented by Heather M. Papp, Gilliland Vanasdale Law Office, LLC.

SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant, represented by Anthony G. Sanchez, Andrews & Price & Christina L. Lane, Andrews & Price.

DONALD J. TYLINSKI, in his individual capacity and as Superintendent of Seneca Valley School District, Defendant, represented by Anthony G. Sanchez, Andrews & Price & Christina L. Lane, Andrews & Price.

MARK KORCINSKY, in his individual capacity and as Principal of Seneca Valley Senior High School, Defendant, represented by Anthony G. Sanchez, Andrews & Price & Christina L. Lane, Andrews & Price.

DENISE MANGANELLO, in her individual capacity and as Assistant Principal of Seneca Valley Senior High School, Defendant, represented by Anthony G. Sanchez, Andrews & Price & Christina L. Lane, Andrews & Price.

ALAN CUMO, in his individual capacity as Principal of Seneca Valley Intermediate High School, Defendant, represented by Anthony G. Sanchez, Andrews & Price & Christina L. Lane, Andrews & Price.

ROBERT RASO, in his individual capacity as Assistant Principal of Seneca Valley Intermediate High School, Defendant, represented by Anthony G. Sanchez, Andrews & Price & Christina L. Lane, Andrews & Price.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant John Roe's motion, filed June 25, 2012, to quash a subpoena issued by the Plaintiff for access to Mr. Roe's public school records in the custody of the Seneca Valley School District ("District"). The time for responses to such motion having passed, it is now ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases