In re FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
This Document Relates to: Indirect and Direct Purchaser Actions.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 2, 2012.
July 2, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Casandra A. Murphy, Joseph H. Meltzer, Terence S. Ziegler, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP, Radnor, PA, David S. Nalven, Edward Notargiacomo, Lauren Guth Barnes, Thomas M. Sobol, Kristen Johnson Parker, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Cambridge, MA, Michael M. Buchman, Pomerantz Haudek, Peter Barile, John D. Radice, Linda P. Nussbaum, Grant & Eisenhofer, New York, NY, David P. Germaine, Joseph M. Vanek, Vanek Vickers & Masini PC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.
Edward D. Rogers, Leslie E. John, Stephen J. Kastenberg, Arthur Makadon, Jason A. Leckerman, Jessica Moltisanti Anthony, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews and Ingersoll, Philadelphia, PA, Roger P. Thomasch, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews and Ingersoll, Denver, CO, for Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Direct and Indirect Purchasers of a steroid nasal spray containing the active ingredient fluticasone propionate ("FP"), along with a generic FP manufacturer, have brought actions against Defendant Smith-Kline Beecham Corporation, doing business as GlaxoSmithKline PLC ("GSK"), the manufacturer of the branded version of FP ("Flonase"...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.