CD ALSTON, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; RICK BRAZIEL; OFFICER PETERSON; SECURITY GUARD SCOTT; OFFICER J. MEIGR; OFFICER STEWART; SUPERVISING SERGEANT ON SITE; and DOES 1 to 10; Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 27, 2012.
June 27, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
C. D. Alston, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
City of Sacramento, Defendant, represented by Sheri M. Chapman , Sacramento City Attorney's Office.
Sacramento City Police Department, Defendant, represented by Sheri M. Chapman , Sacramento City Attorney's Office.
Rick Braziel, Chief, Individually and in his official capacity as Sacramento City Police Department, Defendant, represented by Sheri M. Chapman , Sacramento City Attorney's Office.
Officer Peterson, badge 755, in her individual and official capacity as a police officer of the Sacramento City Police Department, Defendant, represented by Sheri M. Chapman , Sacramento City Attorney's Office.
Security Guard Scott, in his individual capacity, Defendant, represented by John Robert Whitefleet , Porter Scott.
Officer J. Meigr, #432 individually and in his official capacity as a police officer of the Sacramento City Police Department, Defendant, represented by Sheri M. Chapman , Sacramento City Attorney's Office.
Officer Stewart, #752 individually and in his official capacity as a police officer of the Sacramento City Police Department, Defendant, represented by Sheri M. Chapman , Sacramento City Attorney's Office.
Supervising Sergeant on site, in his individual and official capacity, Defendant, represented by Sheri M. Chapman , Sacramento City Attorney's Office.
United States District Court, E.D. California.
ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
On June 20, 2012, defendants City of Sacramento, Rick Braziel, Jason Meier, Andrew Stewart, Erin Peterson, and Dan Farnsworth filed a motion for an order imposing terminating sanctions, striking the complaint, or dismissing this action based on plaintiff's failure to provide initial disclosures and violation of this court's discovery orders.1 Dckt. No. 37. In the alternative, defendants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
