1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WATSON v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC.
 

WATSON v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC.

Civil Action No. 08-cv-00091-WYD-CBS.

WAYNE WATSON and MARY WATSON, Plaintiffs, v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a/ KING SOOPERS, also d/b/a INTER-AMERICAN PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

June 22, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Watson, Plaintiff, represented by Kenneth B. McClain, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC, Andrew Kelley Smith, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC, Scott A. Britton-Mehlisch, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC & Steven E. Crick, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC.

Mary Watson, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Kelley Smith, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC, Kenneth B. McClain, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC, Scott A. Britton-Mehlisch, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC & Steven E. Crick, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC.

Dillon Companies, Inc., doing business as King Soopers doing business as Inter-American-Products, Inc., Defendant, represented by Brett Marshall Godfrey, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C., Jason D. Melichar, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver, Paul Joseph Rupprecht, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C. & Suzanne Marie Meintzer, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver.

Inter-American Products, Inc., Defendant, represented by Brett Marshall Godfrey, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C., Jason D. Melichar, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver, Paul Joseph Rupprecht, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C. & Suzanne Marie Meintzer, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver.

Kroger Co., The, doing business as King Soopers doing business as Inter-American Products, Inc. doing business as Dillon Companies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Brett Marshall Godfrey, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C., Jason D. Melichar, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver, Paul Joseph Rupprecht, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C. & Suzanne Marie Meintzer, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver.

Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation, Defendant, represented by Brett Marshall Godfrey, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C., Jason D. Melichar, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver, Paul Joseph Rupprecht, Godfrey & Lapuyade, P.C. & Suzanne Marie Meintzer, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP-Denver.

Birds Eye Food, Inc., and John doe defendants 9-20, Defendant, represented by Bruce Alford Menk, Hall & Evans, LLC-Denver, Darin James Lang, Hall & Evans, LLC-Denver, Kenneth J. Barrish, Litchfield Cavo, LLP-Chicago & Scott D. Stephenson, Litchfield Cavo, LLP-Chicago.

Cecile Rose, Dr., M.D., Interested Party, represented by Rosemary Orsini, Berenbaum Weinshienk, PC.

ORDER

WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief District Judge.

THIS MATTER came before the Court as part of a status conference held on June 13, 2012. For reasons stated on the record at the June 13, 2012 conference and set forth below, I deny the Kroger Defendants' request to file a motion in limine regarding the testing conducted in Plaintiff's home using the Innova Model 1312 Photoacoustic Multi-Gas Monitor.1

The Kroger Defendants claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases