PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. DELANEY

No. 2:11-CV-0678-LRH-PAL.

PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JACKIE K. DELANEY; et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

June 11, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by Lewis K Loss , Thompson Loss & Judge, LLP, Pro Hac Vice, Matthew J Dendinger , Thompson Loss & Judge, LLP, Pro Hac Vice, Richard W. Boone, Jr. , Thompson, Loss & Judge, LLP, Pro Hac Vice & Thomas W. Davis, II , Howard & Howard.

Jackie K. Delaney, Defendant, represented by Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale & Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale.

Larry E. Carter, Defendant, represented by Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale & Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale.

Mark A. Stout, Defendant, represented by Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale & Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale.

Kenneth Templeton, Defendant, represented by Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale & Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale.

John Shively, Defendant, represented by Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale & Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale.

Steven C. Kalb, Defendant, represented by Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale & Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale.

Jerome F. Snyder, Defendant, represented by Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale & Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale.

Hugh Templeton, Defendant, represented by Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale & Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale.

Rick Dreshler, Defendant, represented by Kevin R Stolworthy , Armstrong Teasdale & Conor P. Flynn , Armstrong Teasdale.

Federal Deposit Insurance Company, as Receiver on behalf of Sun West Bank, Defendant, represented by Andrew M Reidy , Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Pro Hac Vice, Catherine J Serafin , Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Pro Hac Vice, Eric D. Olson , Lee, Hong, Degerman, Kang & Waimey, Pro Hac Vice, Robert R. McCoy , Morris Law Group & Joni A Jamison , Morris Law Group.


ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.

Before the court is defendants' motion to seal certain exhibits in support of their opposition to the motion for summary judgment (Doc. #241). Doc. #25.

A party seeking to file materials under seal bears the burden of showing that the materials are covered by an operative protective order or are also deserving of confidentiality. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases