Louisiana State Conference of the NAACP, for themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Ronald Lawrence Wilson , Ronald L. Wilson, Attorney at Law, Dale E. Ho , NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (New York), Michelle Rupp , Project Vote, Natasha Korgaonkar , NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (New York), Niyati Shah , Ryan P. Haygood , NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (New York) & Sarah Brannon , Project Vote.
Tom Schedler, in his official capacity as the Louisiana Secretary of State, Defendant, represented by Celia R. Cangelosi , Celia R. Cangelosi, Attorney at Law & Carey T. Jones , Carey T. Jones, Attorney at Law.
Ruth Johnson, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Children & Family Services, Defendant, represented by Amy K. Colby , State of Louisiana (Dept. of Children & Family Services), Celia Marie Williams-Alexander , State of Louisiana (Dept. of Children & Family Services) & Eboni M. Townsend , Louisiana Department of Children & Family Services.
Bruce D Greenstein, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant, represented by Stephen Robert Russo , Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals (Baton Rouge), Celia Marie Williams-Alexander , State of Louisiana (Dept. of Children & Family Services), David L. McCay , Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals (Baton Rouge), Douglas L. Cade , Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals (Baton Rouge), Kimberly L. Humbles , Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals (Baton Rouge) & Rebecca Claire Clement , Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals (Baton Rouge).
United States of America, Interested Party, represented by Anna M Baldwin , U. S. Department of Justice (Civil Rights Division) & Sandra Ema Gutierrez , U. S. Attorney's Office (New Orleans).
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.
ORDER & REASONS
JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Certification of Judgment as Final and Appealable and for Stay of Enforcement Pending Appeal (Doc. 213) filed by all Defendants. For the following reasons Defendants' Motion is hereby DENIED.
BACKGROUND
On May 3, 2012, the Court entered an Order and Reasons denying Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
