SMITH v. WOODFORD

No. C 04-4793 RMW (PR).

FLOYD SMITH, Plaintiff, v. J.S. WOODFORD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 7, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Floyd Smith, also known as Raylon Macon, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

J. S. Woodford, Defendant, represented by Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General, Correctional Law.

D. Dacanay, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

K. Williams, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

J. K. Nunez, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

D. Graham, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

E. Young, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

J. Van Blarcom, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

A. Rygg, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

C. D. Grant, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

K. E. Servance, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

S. Dassel, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

M. Tobin, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

Panizza, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

Crandle, in their individual capacities and official capacities, Defendant, represented by Thomas Stuart Patterson , California Attorney General's Offic, Virginia Irene Papan , California Attorney General's Office & Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

R. Brau, Correctional Counselor, Defendant, represented by Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

S. Patraukis, Associate Warden, Defendant, represented by Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.

Simons, Correctional Officer, Defendant, represented by Sharon Anne Garske , Office of the Attorney General.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a second amended civil rights complaint ("SAC") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants discriminated against him based on his sexual orientation, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed an opposition,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases