1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SUPINSKI v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
 

SUPINSKI v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

Case No. 3:06-CV-00793.

EDWARD M. SUPINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

June 5, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward M. Supinski, Plaintiff, represented by Cynthia L. Pollick , The Employment Law Firm.

United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant, represented by Kimberly M. Kaplan , Reed Smith LLP, Miriam S Edelstein , Reed Smith LLP & Shannon E. McClure , Reed Smith LLP.

MEMORANDUM

A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Motion for Relief from an Order Pursuant to Rule 60(b) by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. ("UPS"). Because UPS has not shown extraordinary circumstances meriting relief from the order, its motion will be denied.

I. Background

On February 17, 2012, a jury found that UPS failed to accommodate and retaliated against Plaintiff Edward...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases