UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
CAPITAL TAX CORP., et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 31, 2012.
May 31, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph A. Stewart , United States Attorney's Office (NDIL) & Matthew R. Oakes , U.S. Department of Justice.
United States of America, Counter Defendant, represented by Matthew R. Oakes , U.S. Department of Justice.
United States of America, Counter Defendant, represented by AUSA, United States Attorney's Office (NDIL), Alison Carew McGregor , Department of Justice, Pro Hac Vice & Thomas A Benson , U.S. Department of Justice.
Stephen J Pedi, Cross Defendant, represented by Mark J McAndrew , Barnes & Thornburg LLP & Norman V Chimenti , Martin, Craig, Chester & Sonnenschein.
Capital Tax Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Michael D Hayes , Varga, Berger, Ledsky, Hayes & Casey & Norman Benjamin Berger , Varga Berger Ledsky Hayes & Casey.
Capital Tax Corporation, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michael D Hayes , Varga, Berger, Ledsky, Hayes & Casey & Norman Benjamin Berger , Varga Berger Ledsky Hayes & Casey.
Stephen J Pedi, Cross Claimant, represented by Mark J McAndrew , Barnes & Thornburg LLP.
United States of America, Cross Defendant, represented by Matthew R. Oakes , U.S. Department of Justice & Alison Carew McGregor , Department of Justice, Pro Hac Vice.
Frank Pedi, Cross Claimant, represented by Mark J McAndrew , Barnes & Thornburg LLP.
United States of America, Cross Defendant, represented by Kurt N. Lindland , United States Attorney's Office (NDIL).
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
YOUNG B. KIM, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is the government's petition for rule to show cause why SunWest Mortgage Company, Inc. ("SunWest") and Defendant William Lerch should not be held in contempt for violating the citations to discover assets and this court's July 19, 2011 garnishment order. For the following reasons, the petition is denied:
Background
On January 13, 2011, the government served a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
