RICHARD S. v. SEBELIUS

C/A No. 3:12-007-TMC.

Richard S.; Nancy S., Parent of Richard S.; Rob L.; Mary S., Parent of Rob L.; on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs, v. Kathleen Sebelius; Cynthia Mann; John Doe 1 through 20, CMS; Anthony Keck; and the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

May 25, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard S, Plaintiff, represented by Patricia L Harrison , Patricia Logan Harrison Law Office.

Nancy S, Parent of Richard S, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, represented by Patricia L Harrison , Patricia Logan Harrison Law Office.

Rob L, Plaintiff, represented by Patricia L Harrison , Patricia Logan Harrison Law Office.

Mary S, Parent of Rob L, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, represented by Patricia L Harrison , Patricia Logan Harrison Law Office.

Kathleen Sebelius, Defendant, represented by Christie V Newman , US Attorneys Office.

Cynthia Mann, Defendant, represented by Christie V Newman , US Attorneys Office.

John Doe 1 through 20, Defendant, represented by Christie V Newman , US Attorneys Office.

CMS, Defendant, represented by Christie V Newman , US Attorneys Office.

Anthony Keck, Defendant, represented by Damon C Wlodarczyk , Riley Pope and Laney, Nikole H Boland , Riley Pope and Laney & Roy F Laney , Riley Pope and Laney.

South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant, represented by Damon C Wlodarczyk , Riley Pope and Laney, Nikole H Boland , Riley Pope and Laney & Roy F Laney , Riley Pope and Laney.


OPINION & ORDER

TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendants Anthony Keck and South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services' ("Defendants'") Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff has filed a response opposing the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss is denied.

Defendants moved to dismiss the above complaint contending it fails to comply with Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases