1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RANQUIST v. M & M INDUSTRIES, INC.
 

RANQUIST v. M & M INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 2:11-cv-387-DBH.

CHRISTIE RANQUIST, Plaintiff v. M & M INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant

United States District Court, D. Maine.

May 24, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CHRISTIE RANQUIST, Plaintiff, represented by ALLISON G. GRAY, MAINE EMPLOYEE RIGHTS GROUP, CHAD T. HANSEN, MAINE EMPLOYEE RIGHTS GROUP & PETER L. THOMPSON, MAINE EMPLOYEE RIGHTS GROUP.

RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

JOHN H. RICH, III, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Christie Ranquist moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) for a default judgment against defendant M & M Industries, Inc. ("M & M") as to both counts of her complaint, by which she seeks damages for unlawful sex discrimination in violation of the Maine Human Rights Act ("MHRA"), 5 M.R.S.A. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases