1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. SIDENSE CORPORATION
 

KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. SIDENSE CORPORATION

No. C 10-02066 SI.

KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY INC., Plaintiff, v. SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 24, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kilopass Technology, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Imran A. Khaliq, SNR Denton U.S., Jimmy M. Shin, SNR Denton US LLP, Mark Lee Hogge, Greenberg Traurig LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Matthew Peter Larson, SNR Denton US LLP, Qian Huang, SNR Denton US LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Rachel A Repka, SNR Denton US LLP & Shailendra K Maheshwari,, SNR Denton US LLP, PRO HAC VICE.

Sidense Corporation, Defendant, represented by Roger L. Cook, Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP, Eric M. Hutchins, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Imran A. Khaliq, SNR Denton U.S. & Robert D Tadlock, Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Defendant moved for leave to amend its invalidity contentions. The motion is scheduled for hearing on May 25, 2012. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and therefore VACATES the hearing. For the reasons below,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases