1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PLACENCIA v. I-FLOW CORPORATION
 

PLACENCIA v. I-FLOW CORPORATION

No. CV10-2520 PHX DGC.

Gilbert S. Placencia and Theresa Placencia, Plaintiffs, v. I-Flow Corporation, a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

May 24, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert S Placencia, Plaintiff, represented by Frank Woodson , Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles PC, Heather A Brann , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC, Laura B Kalur , Kalur Law Office LLC, Leslie W OLeary , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC, Matthew E Munson , Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles PC, Michael L Williams , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC, Serena C Montague , Begam & Marks PA & Thomas B Powers , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC — Portland, OR.

Theresa Placencia, Plaintiff, represented by Heather A Brann , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC, Laura B Kalur , Kalur Law Office LLC, Leslie W OLeary , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC, Michael L Williams , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC, Serena C Montague , Begam & Marks PA & Thomas B Powers , Williams Love OLeary & Powers PC — Portland, OR.

I-Flow Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, represented by Christian M Ryba , Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Donn Christopher Alexander , Jones Skelton & Hochuli PLC, P Mark Crane , Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney Limited — Chicago, IL, Paul E Wojcicki , Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney Ltd & Peter J Strelitz , Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney Limited — Austin, TX.

Breg Incorporated, named as: Breg, Inc./ a California Corporation, Defendant, represented by David S Lill , Bowman & Brooke LLP — Austin, TX, Lori Ann Zirkle , Bowman & Brooke LLP, Mary T Novacheck , Bowman & Brooke LLP & William NG Barron, IV , Bowman & Brooke LLP — Minneapolis, MN.

ORDER

DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a diversity-jurisdiction product liability case brought under state law. Plaintiffs allege that Gilbert Placencia was injured by Defendants' pain pump, which was installed in his shoulder after arthroscopic surgery. The Court held a discovery conference call with the parties on May 24, 2012. Following the call, Plaintiffs' counsel provided the Court with copies of the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notices that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases