1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PACTIV CORPORATION v. MULTISORB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 

PACTIV CORPORATION v. MULTISORB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 10 C 461.

PACTIV CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MULTISORB TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

May 18, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pactiv Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Carrie A. Longstaff , Gibbons, P.C., Pro Hac Vice, David Edward De lorenzi , Gibbons P.c., Pro Hac Vice, Frank Anthony Bruno , Gibbons P.C., Pro Hac Vice, Jonathan Mandel Weis , Levin Ginsburg, Wendy R Stein , Gibbons, P.C. & Mitchell S. Chaban , Levin Ginsburg.

Multisorb Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by David Howard Bluestone , Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Gary Melchior Ropski , Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Jacob Christopher Bachman , Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Jennifer L Friedman , Mcgee & Gelman, Pro Hac Vice, Laura A Colca , Mcgee & Gelman, Pro Hac Vice, Michael Mcgee , Mcgee & Gelman, Pro Hac Vice & Stephen B. Salai , Harter Secrest & Emery Llp, Pro Hac Vice.

Desiccare, Inc., Movant, represented by Daniel I. Konieczny , Tabet DiVito & Rothstein, LLC.

Pactiv Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Carrie A. Longstaff , Gibbons, P.C., Pro Hac Vice, David Edward De lorenzi , Gibbons P.c., Pro Hac Vice, Frank Anthony Bruno , Gibbons P.C., Pro Hac Vice, Jonathan Mandel Weis , Levin Ginsburg & Mitchell S. Chaban , Levin Ginsburg.

Multisorb Technologies, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by David Howard Bluestone , Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Gary Melchior Ropski , Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Jacob Christopher Bachman , Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Jennifer L Friedman , Mcgee & Gelman, Laura A Colca , Mcgee & Gelman & Michael Mcgee , Mcgee & Gelman.

Pactiv Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Wendy R Stein , Gibbons, P.C..

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the December 14, 2011 Order directing it to turn over all documents on its privilege log. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

This case is the consolidation of two patent infringement cases regarding oxygen absorbers or "scavengers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases