WILKINSON v. STATE

Case No. 2:10-CV-523 TS.

TERRY LEE WILKINSON, et al., Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF UTAH, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.

May 10, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry Lee Wilkinson, Plaintiff, represented by Brian M. Barnard , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC & Stewart W. Gollan , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC.

Patty Eagle, Plaintiff, represented by Brian M. Barnard , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC & Stewart W. Gollan , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC.

Jackie Sanchez, Plaintiff, represented by Brian M. Barnard , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC & Stewart W. Gollan , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC.

Steve Ray Evans, Plaintiff, represented by Brian M. Barnard , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC & Stewart W. Gollan , UTAH LEGAL CLINIC.

State of Utah, The, a governmental entity, Defendant, represented by Jerrold S. Jensen , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857) & Thomas D. Roberts , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857).

Gary R. Herbert, Governor of the State of Utah, Defendant, represented by Jerrold S. Jensen , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857) & Thomas D. Roberts , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857).

Mark L. Shurtleff, Attorney General of the State of Utah, Defendant, represented by Jerrold S. Jensen , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857) & Thomas D. Roberts , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857).

Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation, Defendant, represented by J. Wesley Robinson , SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION & Margaret D. Plane , SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION.

Daniel Fuhr, Colonel, Superintendent, Utah Highway Patrol, Defendant, represented by Jerrold S. Jensen , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857) & Thomas D. Roberts , UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (160-140857).


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING STATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

TED STEWART, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the State of Utah, Utah Governor Gary R. Herbert, Utah Attorney General Mark L. Shurtleff, and Utah Highway Patrol Superintendent Colonel Daniel Fuhr's ("State Defendants") Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny State Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases