1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WILLIAMS v. RILEY
 

WILLIAMS v. RILEY

Civil Action No. 2:05cv83-P-B.

TAMMY WILLIAMS, EARL RUSSELL and CHERYL HAMBRICK, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES RILEY, in his official capacity as Sheriff of DeSoto County Mississippi, STEVE ATKINSON, individually and in his official capacity as deputy sheriff and jail administrator of Desoto County, Mississippi, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division.

May 2, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tammy Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Jim D. Waide, III , WAIDE & ASSOCIATES, PA, Richard Shane McLaughlin , MCLAUGHLIN LAW FIRM, Luther C. Fisher, IV , Luke Fisher Law, PLLC & Rachel M. Pierce , WAIDE & ASSOCIATES, PA.

Earl Russell, Plaintiff, represented by Jim D. Waide, III , WAIDE & ASSOCIATES, PA, Richard Shane McLaughlin , MCLAUGHLIN LAW FIRM, Luther C. Fisher, IV , Luke Fisher Law, PLLC & Rachel M. Pierce , WAIDE & ASSOCIATES, PA.

Cheryl Hambrick, Plaintiff, represented by Jim D. Waide, III , WAIDE & ASSOCIATES, PA, Richard Shane McLaughlin , MCLAUGHLIN LAW FIRM, Luther C. Fisher, IV , Luke Fisher Law, PLLC, Nicole H. McLaughlin , MCLAUGHLIN LAW FIRM & Rachel M. Pierce , WAIDE & ASSOCIATES, PA.

Sheriff James A. Riley, In His Official and personal capacities, Defendant, represented by Anthony E. Nowak , SMITH, PHILLIPS, MITCHELL, SCOTT & NOWAK, David A. Barfield , BARFIELD & ASSOCIATES, Joseph David Neyman, Jr. , SMITH, PHILLIPS, MITCHELL, SCOTT & NOWAK, Megan Carlisle Willoughby , SMITH, PHILLIPS, MITCHELL, SCOTT & NOWAK & Steven Lloyd Lacey , BARFIELD & ASSOCIATES.

Steve Atkinson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff and Jail Administrator of Desoto County, Mississippi, Defendant, represented by Steven Lloyd Lacey , BARFIELD & ASSOCIATES & Joseph David Neyman, Jr. , SMITH, PHILLIPS, MITCHELL, SCOTT & NOWAK.

ORDER

MICHAEL P. MILLS, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and New Trial or Remittitur [231]. The Court, having reviewed the motion, the response, the briefs of the parties, the authorities cited and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds as follows, to-wit:

Defendants seek to renew their motion for judgment as a matter of law with regard to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases