JOSHUA ALAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY ANDERSON and TESCO SERVICES, INC., Defendants,
CHARTIS CASUALTY COMPANY/AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE COMPANY and GLOBAL RECOVERY SERVICES, Intervenors.
United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 16, 2012.
April 16, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Joshua Alan Williams, Plaintiff, represented by A. Laurie Koller, Carr & Carr — Tulsa, Guy Allen Thiessen, Carr & Carr — Tulsa & Patrick Eugene Carr, Carr & Carr — Tulsa.
TESCO Services Inc, originally sued as TESCO Corporation, Defendant, represented by G. Spence Fricke, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A., John Carter Fairley, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A. & Samuel Brent Wakefield, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A..
Jeffrey Anderson, Defendant, represented by G. Spence Fricke, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A., John Carter Fairley, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A. & Samuel Brent Wakefield, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A..
Chartis Casualty Company/American International South Insurance Company, Intervenor, represented by Melissa Faye Wood, Worley, Wood & Parrish, P.A..
Global Recovery Services, Intervenor, represented by Melissa Faye Wood, Worley, Wood & Parrish, P.A..
TESCO Services Inc, originally sued as TESCO Corporation, Cross Claimant, represented by G. Spence Fricke, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A., John Carter Fairley, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A. & Samuel Brent Wakefield, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A..
Jeffrey Anderson, Cross Claimant, represented by G. Spence Fricke, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A. & John Carter Fairley, Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A..
United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
1. Several months ago, the Court entered a comprehensive order denying various motions for summary judgment and motions to exclude proposed expert testimony. Document No. 149. On one point (Anderson and his employer TESCO Services's motion for summary judgment based on no duty), the Court denied without prejudice. The Court indicated that it wanted to reconsider this issue: it requested "focused...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
