1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 807 F.Supp.2d
  5. 807 F.Supp.2d 214 (2011)
 

MILESCO v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP.

No. 1:09-cv-01233.

807 F.Supp.2d 214 (2011)

Tyler Z. MILESCO, Plaintiff, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk Southern Railway Company; and ACF Industries, LLC, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Joy Technologies, Inc., f/k/a Joy Mining Machinery; and Amsted Rail Company, f/k/a ASF-Keystone, Inc., Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

September 6, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Sadlock, Neil J. Rovner, Angino & Rovner, Harrisburg, PA, for Plaintiff.

Craig J. Staudenmaier, Joshua D. Bonn, Nauman, Smith, Shissler & Hall, LLP, Harrisburg, PA, John Ehmann, John C. McMeekin, II, Rawle & Henderson, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs.

Edward M. Koch, James J. Donohue, Thomas Justin Chapman, White and Williams, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Third-Party Defendants.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge.

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Pending before the Court is Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff ACF Industries, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims for Lack Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Federal Preemption). (Doc. 127). For the following reasons, we shall deny the pending motion.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY and FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On June 5, 2009...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases