HOPKINS v. GRANT THORNTON INTERN.

Civil Action No. 10-cv-2025 (RMC).

851 F.Supp.2d 146 (2012)

Richard Lane HOPKINS, Plaintiff, v. GRANT THORNTON INTERNATIONAL and Grant Thornton LLP, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 31, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith William Diener, Art of Lawyering, PLLC, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff.

Michael Branch Kimberly, Andrew A. Nicely, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant Grant Thornton International.

Jonathan Rose, Emily Costin, Alston & Bird, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant Grant Thornton LLP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Richard Lane Hopkins claims that Grant Thornton LLP interfered with his rights to leave without pay for a serious medical condition and also retaliated against him for asking for such leave by firing him. Mr. Hopkins misperceives his legal rights and the standards that pertain to his claims. Finding that his claims have no merit, the Court will grant summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases