GARY S. HANN, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF YPSILANTI, ET AL., Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 29, 2012.
February 29, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Gary S Hann, individually and as Sole Beneficiary, Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Gary S. Hann IRA, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Ypsilanti, City of, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Edward Koryzno, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Ronald Monroe, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Uriah Hamilton, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Joshua J Lawther, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Sharon Doom, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Karl Barr, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Jesse O'Jack, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Martinez, John Doe, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Frank Daniels, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Debbie Neville, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Frances McMullen, Defendant, represented by Thomas F. Myers, Garan Lucow (Detroit).
Washtenaw, County of, Defendant, represented by Cynthia L. Reach, Reach Law Firm.
Gene DeRossett, Defendant, represented by Cynthia L. Reach, Reach Law Firm.
Michigan Tax Tribunal, Defendant, represented by Steven B. Flancher, Michigan Department of Attorney General, Corrections Division.
Kimball R Smith, III, Defendant, represented by Steven B. Flancher, Michigan Department of Attorney General, Corrections Division.
United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
On May 23, 2011, Plaintiff Gary S. Hann filed a pro se civil complaint in this Court, bringing claims of various constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a number of state law claims. He names 16 Defendants. Before the Court are three dispositive motions, all referred for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B):
(1) Motion to Dismiss...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
