U.S. v. RENZI

No. CR 08-212 TUC DCB (BPV).

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard G. Renzi, James W. Sandlin, and Dwayne Lequire, Defendants,

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

March 26, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard G Renzi, Defendant (1), represented by Brian Matthew Heberlig,, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, David Matthew Fragale,, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Kelly B Kramer, Mayer Brown LLP — Washington, DC, Reid Henry Weingarten,, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Emily Crandall Harlan,, Nixon Peabody LLP, Linda C Bailey,, Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Stacey Faith Gottlieb, Greenberg Traurig LLP.

James W Sandlin, Defendant (2), represented by Humberto S Garcia, Nall Pelley Wynne & Smith LLP, John Hunter Smith,, Nall Pelley Wynne & Smith LLP & Richard B Jones, Law Office of Richard B Jones.

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington, Amicus, represented by Melanie Sloan, Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington.

Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the US House of Representatives, Amicus, represented by Katherine E McCarron, US House of Representatives, Office of the General Counsel, Kerry W Kircher, US House of Representatives, Office of General Counsel, Christine Davenport,, US House of Representatives, Office of General Counsel, Kirsten W Konar,, US House of Representatives, Office of General Counsel & William Pittard,, US House of Representatives, Office of General Counsel.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Gary Michael Restaino, US Attorneys Office — Phoenix, AZ, Peter Michael Koski, US DOJ, Public Integrity Section, Edward T Kang, US Dept of Justice, Criminal Division Public Integrity Section, Emily Rae Woods, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division Public Integrity Section & Michael Joseph Ferrara, US DOJ, Criminal Division — Public Integrity Section.


ORDER

DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.

The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court and denies Defendant Renzi's Motion to Dismiss for separation of powers violations.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

On December 12, 2011, Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco issued the R&R. (Doc. 944.) He recommends the Court should not exercise its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases