1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. YOUNG v. PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
 

YOUNG v. PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

Case No. 5:11-cv-05668 EJD, No. 5:11-cv-05669 EJD.

GREG YOUNG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., et. al., Defendant(s). MATTHEW SANDNAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., et. al., Defendant(s).

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

March 13, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greg Young, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by Mary K. Blasy , Scott + Scott LLP.

Robert Burlingame, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Stuart Strimling , Bramson Plutzik Mahler & Birkhaeuser, LLP.

Pacific Biosciences of California Inc, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Hugh C. Martin, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Susan K. Barnes, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Brian B. Dow, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Brook Byers, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

William W. Ericson, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Michael Hunkapiller, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Randall S. Livingston, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Susan Siegel, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

David B. Singer, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Catherine Eugenia Moreno , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Pro Hac Vice & Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Defendant, represented by Bruce D. Angiolillo , Simpson Thacher and Bartlett, Jonathan K. Youngwood , Simpson Thacher and Bartlett & Simona Gurevich Strauss , Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

Morgan Stanley & Co Inc., Defendant, represented by Simona Gurevich Strauss , Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Defendant, represented by Simona Gurevich Strauss , Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

Piper Jaffray & Co, Defendant, represented by Simona Gurevich Strauss , Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO REMAND [Docket Item Nos. 5, 17] [Docket Item No. 4]

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In these related securities actions, Plaintiffs Greg Young and Matthew Sandnas allege claims for violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a et. seq. (the "1933 Act"), individually and on behalf of a purported class, against Defendants Pacific...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases