1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HAMMONDS v. DOE
 

HAMMONDS v. DOE

Civil Action No. 10-444.

RICHARD HAMMONDS, JD 8826, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE II; JOHN DOE III; JOHN DOE IV; OFFICER RANDY JUSTICE; OFFICER KOVAC; OFFICER MAXWELL; OFFICER PENDAL; OFFICER EDWARDS; OFFICER YOUNG; OFFICER CHRONISTER; OFFICER HOLLOWAY; OFFICER WILLIAM FRANCIS; OFFICER BEST; SGT. ANDREW COULTER; WARDEN RAMON RUSTIN; CHIEF EXECUTIVE DAN ONORATO, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

February 7, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

RICHARD A. HAMMONDS, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

OFFICER RANDY JUSTICE, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER KOVAC, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER MAXWELL, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER PENDAL, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER EDWARDS, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER YOUNG, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER CHRONISTER, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER HOLLOWAY, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER WILLIAM FRANCIS, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

OFFICER BEST, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

SGT ANDREW COULTER, Defendant, represented by Craig E. Maravich & Michael H. Wojcik , Allegheny County Law Department.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CYNTHIA REED EDDY, Magistrate Judge.

I. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons that follow, it is respectfully recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 55) be granted with respect to Plaintiff's official liability claims against all Defendants and denied with respect to Plaintiff's individual liability claims except as to Defendants Onorato...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases