FOX v. U.S.

Civil Action No. 3:10cv126-DPJ-MTP.

CARL FOX, III Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.

February 27, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Fox, III, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

United States of America, Defendant, represented by Alfred B. Jernigan, Jr. , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson & Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

United States Department of Justice, Defendant, represented by Alfred B. Jernigan, Jr. , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson & Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

Veterans Administration, Washington, DC, Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

Unknown Physician, Past Chief of Cardiologist (1998), Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

Unknown Physician, Current Chief of Cardiologist, VAMC, Jackson, MS, Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

Unknown Nasrala, Past Chief of Neurologists, VAMC, Jackson, MS, Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

Unknown Physician, who sent Carl Fox home originally from the Emergency Rm. around March 17, 2006, Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.

U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Defendant, represented by Mitzi Dease Paige , U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — Jackson.


ORDER

DANIEL P. JORDAN, III, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on several motions of Plaintiff Carl Fox, proceeding pro se: Motion to Cease/Desist and Reinstate [his] Last Sixteen Defendants [119]; Motion to Reinstate All the Past Defendants [127]; and Motion to Compel and Motion for Summary Judgment [149]. The Court has held these motions in abeyance while the parties explored settlement. Thus far, those efforts have not been fruitful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases