1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 844 F.Supp.2d
  5. 844 F.Supp.2d 897 (2012)
 

CITY OF GOODLETTSVILLE, TENN. v. PRICELINE.COM

Case No. 3:08-cv-00561.

844 F.Supp.2d 897 (2012)

The CITY OF GOODLETTSVILLE, TENNESSEE, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated taxing authorities within the State of Tennessee, Plaintiff, v. PRICELINE.COM, INC.; Lowest Fare. Com, Inc.; Travelweb, LLC; Travelocity.Com, Inc.; Travelocity.Com, LP; Site 59.COM, LLC; Expedia, Inc.; Hotels.Com, LP Hotwire, Inc.; Travelnow.Com, Inc. Trip Network, Inc. (d/ b/a Cheaptickets, Inc.); and Orbitz, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.

February 21, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew M. Volk, Christopher A. O'Hara, Karl P. Barth, Steve W. Berman, Nicholas J. Styant-Browne, Hagens, Berman, Sobol, Shapiro, LLP, Seattle, WA, Christopher Lovell, Jody Krisiloff, Lovell, Stewart & Halebian, LLP, New York, NY, James Todd Moore, Thomas Holland McKinnie, Jr., Franklin, TN, Paul M. Weiss, Freed & Weiss, LLC, Chicago, IL, Richard Burke, Richard J. Burke LLC, St. Louis, MO, Elizabeth A. Sanders, Keli J. Oliver, Metropolitan Legal Department, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff.

Celso M. Gonzalez-Falla, Jr., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Houston, TX, Darrel J. Hieber, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Karen Lynn Valihura, Randolph K. Herndon, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, Wilmington, DE, James M. Doran, Jr., Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, Nashville, TN, Brian S. Stagner, Scott Wiehle, Kelly, Hart & Hallman, Fort Worth, TX, Deborah S. Sloan, James P. Karen, Tamara Marinkovic, Jones Day, Dallas, TX, Elizabeth Brooke Herrington, Lazar Pol Raynal, Stephanie Lynn Poulos, McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM

ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.

In this class action for which the City of Goodlettsville, Tennessee ("City"), serves as the party plaintiff, the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The defendants filed a joint Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 299), which the City opposed (Docket No. 347), and the defendants filed a joint Reply (Docket No. 366). The City also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 302...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases