1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FRAZIER v. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
 

FRAZIER v. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES

Civil Action No. 11-1863.

CRAIG FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

February 13, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CRAIG FRAZIER, Plaintiff represented by JEFFREY R. ELLIOTT , KOZLOFF STOUDT.

EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant represented by SIDNEY R. STEINBERG , POST & SCHELL PC.

EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant represented by ROBERT J. TOY , POST & SCHELL, P.C..

ORDER

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant, Exide Technologies, "Motion to Dismiss In Part" (Doc. No. 9) and Plaintiff's response thereto, and for reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases