DUMONT v. HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Nos. CV-11-1161-PHX-GMS, 2:10-BK-29498, Adv. No. 2:10-AP-02323.

Raymond Joseph Dumont and Kathleen Ann Dumont, Appellants, v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation, USA, Federal National Mortgage Association and Lender Processing Services, Inc., Appellees.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

January 31, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond Joseph Dumont, also named as: Raymond J. Dumont and Raymond Dumont/ Debtor, Appellant represented by Douglas C Rhoads, Rhoads & Associates PLC.

Kathleen Ann Dumont, also named as: Kathleen A. Dumont and Kathleen Dumont/ Debtor, Appellant represented by Douglas C Rhoads, Rhoads & Associates PLC.

HSBC Mortgage Corporation USA, Appellee, represented by Andrew Vance Hardenbrook, Snell & Wilmer LLP — Phoenix, AZ.

HSBC Mortgage Corporation USA, Appellee, represented by Steven D Jerome, Snell & Wilmer LLP — Phoenix, AZ.

Federal National Mortgage Association, Appellee, represented by Andrew Vance Hardenbrook, Snell & Wilmer LLP — Phoenix, AZ.

Federal National Mortgage Association, Appellee, represented by Leonard J McDonald, Jr., Tiffany & Bosco PA.

Federal National Mortgage Association, Appellee, represented by Steven D Jerome, Snell & Wilmer LLP — Phoenix, AZ.

Federal National Mortgage Association, Appellee, represented by William Morris Fischbach, III, Tiffany & Bosco PA.

Lender Processing Services Incorporated, Appellee, represented by Jessica Renee Kenney, McCarthy Holthus Levine.

Lender Processing Services Incorporated, Appellee, represented by Matthew Allen Silverman, McCarthy Holthus Levine.

Lender Processing Services Incorporated, Appellee, represented by Paul M Levine, McCarthy Holthus Levine.

Tiffany & Bosco PA, named as: Tiffany & Bosco, Appellee Pro Se.

Michael A Bosco, Trustee, its Assigns and/or successors in interest, Appellee represented by Michael A Bosco, Jr., Tiffany & Bosco PA.


ORDER

G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Debtors' Appeal from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's Order Granting Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Prejudice entered on May 10, 2011 (Doc. 1 at 5-6). After reviewing the pleadings and record excerpts submitted for purposes of this appeal, and having determined that oral argument is unnecessary,1 the Court affirms the Bankruptcy Court's judgment as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases