1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GOONEWARDENA v. NORTH SHORE LONG ISLAND JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM
 

GOONEWARDENA v. NORTH SHORE LONG ISLAND JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM

No. 11-CV-2456 (NGG) (LB).

PRANANNA W. GOONEWARDENA, Plaintiff, v. NORTH SHORE LONG ISLAND JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM, THE ZUCKER HILLSIDE HOSPITAL, LUDMILA P. DAHSEVSKY, Psychiatrist, TINA WALSH, Psychiatrist, PAULINA WALFISCH, Program Director, MAHENDRA AIREN, Psychiatrist, JOHN KANE, Chairman, IN SOON YANG, NP, REMY GALLANT, Mental Health Worker, CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS, RN, MARY AFFLERBACH, Social Worker, EDWARD REDMOND, Social Worker, JOHN DOE, African American Security Guard, and GERALD P. RYAN, Security Director, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

January 31, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prasanna W. Goonewardena, Plaintiff Pro Se.

North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

Ludmila P. Dashevsky, Psychiatrist, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

Tina Walch, Psychiatrist, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

Pauline Walfisch, Program Director, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

Mahendra Airen, Psychiatrist, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

John Kane, Chairman, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

In Soon Yang, NP, Defendant represented by Robert Frank Elliott , Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP.

ORDER

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Prananna W. Goonewardena, who is pro se, purports to moves for my recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and (b)(1). (Docket Entry # 95.) This is his second such motion (see First Mot. for Recusal (Docket Entry # 85); Order Denying Mot. for Recusal (Docket Entry # 87).), and so ordinarily it would be barred by the law of the case doctrine.1 Because Goonewardena is pro...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases