CELIA MARSHALL, as parent and next friend of T.T., a minor, Plaintiff,
v.
LONNIE NETZEL, in his individual and official capacity as an employee of the City of Kankakee, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 27, 2012.
January 27, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Celia Marshall, as parent and next friend of T.T., a minor, Plaintiff represented by James R Rowe, II , The Law Firm of Rowe & Associates.
Lonnie Netzel, in his individual capacity, Defendant represented by Michael D Bersani , Hervas Condon & Bersani PC.
Lonnie Netzel, in his individual capacity, Defendant represented by Zrinka Rukavina , Hervas Condon & Bersani PC.
City of Kankakee, municipal corporation, Defendant represented by Bradford S Purcell , Purcell & Wardrope Chtd.
City of Kankakee, municipal corporation, Defendant represented by Jennifer E Simms , Purcell & Wardrope Chtd.
City of Kankakee, municipal corporation, Defendant represented by Jonathan P Schaefer , Purcell & Wardrope Chtd.
City of Kankakee, municipal corporation, Defendant represented by Thomas B Underwood , Purcell & Wardrope Chtd.
Board of Education of Kankakee School District 111, Defendant represented by Jeffrey S Taylor , Spesia Ayers & Ardaugh.
Board of Education of Kankakee School District 111, Defendant represented by Michael R Stiff , Spesia Ayers & Ardaugh.
Lisa Walls, in their individual capacity, Defendant represented by Jeffrey S Taylor , Spesia Ayers & Ardaugh.
Lisa Walls, Defendant represented by Michael R Stiff , Spesia Ayers & Ardaugh.
- Brown, Ms Brown, in their individual capacity, Defendant represented by Jeffrey S Taylor , Spesia Ayers & Ardaugh.
- Brown, Defendant represented by Michael R Stiff , Spesia Ayers & Ardaugh.
United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division.
OPINION
MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, Chief District Judge.
This case is before the court for ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Briefing on Defendant Lonnie Netzel's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Require Production on Transcripts Referenced in Netzel's Motion, or, in the alternative, Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Netzel's Motion filed in Case Nos. 10-2007, 10-2008, 10-2011, 10-2024, and 10-2191. Defendant Netzel has...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
