FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, a non-profit corporation, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, a non-profit corporation, and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, and MAJOR GENERAL MERDITH W.B. TEMPLE, in his official capacity, Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 25, 2012.
January 25, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Friends of the River, Plaintiff, represented by Ernest Robert Wright , Friends Of The River.
Friends of the River, Plaintiff, represented by Jason C. Rylander , Defenders of Wildlife.
Friends of the River, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa Tamara Belenky , Center for Biological Diversity.
Defenders of Wildlife, Plaintiff, represented by Jason C. Rylander , Defenders of Wildlife.
Defenders of Wildlife, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa Tamara Belenky , Center for Biological Diversity.
Center for Biological Diversity, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa Tamara Belenky , Center for Biological Diversity.
Center for Biological Diversity, Plaintiff, represented by Jason C. Rylander , Defenders of Wildlife.
Dept of Fish & Game, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Deborah L. Barnes , Office Of The Attorney General.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Defendant, represented by Devon Lehman McCune , United States Department of Justice.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Defendant, represented by John H. Martin , GOVT, US Department of Justice.
Robert L. Van Antwerp, Lt. General, Defendant represented by Devon Lehman McCune , United States Department of Justice.
Robert L. Van Antwerp, Defendant, represented by John H. Martin , GOVT, US Department of Justice.
United States District Court, E.D. California.
Order
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
The California Department of Fish and Game ("DFG") moves for intervention of right as a plaintiff under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2). Doc. Nos. 29 & 39. The existing Plaintiffs have filed a response indicating that they do not oppose DFG's motion. Doc. No. 32. The Federal Defendants have filed an opposition. Doc. No. 38. Upon consideration of the parties' briefing, and having heard and considered the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
