MVP GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. SUPERVALU, INC.

Civil No. 2:09-CV-02636.

MVP GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SUPERVALU, INC. AND NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division.

January 19, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MVP Group International LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Eleni Maria Roumel , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough (Ch).

MVP Group International LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough.

Supervalu Inc, Defendant, represented by Adriane Malanos Belton , Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice.

Supervalu Inc, Defendant, represented by David Michael Collins , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

Supervalu Inc, Defendant, represented by Sean Houseal , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

New Albertson's Inc, Defendant, represented by Adriane Malanos Belton , Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice.

New Albertson's Inc, Defendant, represented by David Michael Collins , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

New Albertson's Inc, Defendant, represented by Sean Houseal , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

Supervalu Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Adriane Malanos Belton , Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice.

Supervalu Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by David Michael Collins , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

Supervalu Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Sean Houseal , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

New Albertson's Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Adriane Malanos Belton , Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice.

New Albertson's Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by David Michael Collins , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

New Albertson's Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Sean Houseal , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee.

MVP Group International LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Eleni Maria Roumel , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough (Ch).

MVP Group International LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough.


ORDER

DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Having thoroughly considered the parties' written submissions, the court holds that a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether the contract was constructively terminated. Therefore, the court DENIES plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and sets jury selection for this case on February 28, 2012.

AND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases