NORTH AMERICAN LUBRICANTS COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
SHANE A. TERRY, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 13, 2012.
January 13, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
North American Lubricants Co., Plaintiff, represented by Robert Weems, Weems Law Offices.
North American Lubricants Co., Plaintiff, represented by Margaret Mullin Weems, Weems Law Offices.
Shane A Terry, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
Shane A Terry, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
Michael Goldman, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
Michael Goldman, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
Gavin Hensing, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
Gavin Hensing, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
Claude C Terry, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
Claude C Terry, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
Paul A Ormond, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
Paul A Ormond, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
Ralph H Palmen, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
Ralph H Palmen, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
Gary B O'Malley, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
Gary B O'Malley, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
United Petroleum, LLC, Defendant, represented by Matthew J. Ruggles, Littler Mendelson.
United Petroleum, LLC, Defendant, represented by Eric R. Ostrem, Littler Mendelson.
United States District Court, E.D. California.
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff's motion to withdraw admissions, which was filed on December 1, 2011 and came on regularly for hearing on January 12, 2012. (Dkt. No. 42.) On January 5, 2012, the parties filed their joint statement regarding the discovery disagreement pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 251 (dkt. nos. 63, 641), along with declarations by counsel (dkt. nos. 62, 66).
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.