MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A. MOBILE, Plaintiffs,
v.
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI; PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S. BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA; ANIMESH NASKAR, Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Mandana D Farhang, Plaintiff represented by Micah R. Jacobs , Jacobs Law Group SF.
M.A. Mobile Ltd., Plaintiff represented by Sanjiv Nand Singh , Sanjiv N. Singh, A Professional Law Corporation.
M.A. Mobile Ltd., Plaintiff represented by Micah R. Jacobs , Jacobs Law Group SF.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, an Indian Institute of Technology incorporated under the Institutes of Technology, Act 1961, Defendant represented by Indra Neel Chatterjee , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, an Indian Institute of Technology incorporated under the ""Institutes of Technology, Act 1961"", Defendant represented by Christopher Benjamin Yeh , Duane Morris LLP.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, an Indian Institute of Technology incorporated under the Institutes of Technology, Act 1961, Defendant represented by Morvarid Metanat , Orrick Herrington et al.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, an Indian Institute of Technology incorporated under the Institutes of Technology, Act 1961, Defendant represented by Nitin Gambhir , Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, an Indian Institute of Technology incorporated under the Institutes of Technology, Act 1961, Defendant represented by Theresa Ann Sutton , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Technology Entrepreneurship and Training Society, an Indian society, Defendant represented by Indra Neel Chatterjee , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Technology Entrepreneurship and Training Society, Defendant represented by Nitin Gambhir , Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe.
Technology Entrepreneurship and Training Society, Defendant represented by Theresa Ann Sutton , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Partha P Chakrabarti, Defendant represented by Indra Neel Chatterjee , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Partha P Chakrabarti, Defendant represented by Nitin Gambhir , Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe.
Partha P Chakrabarti, Defendant represented by Theresa Ann Sutton , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Animesh Naskar, Defendant represented by Theresa Ann Sutton , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Miscellaneous, represented by James Elliott Thompson , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, an Indian Institute of Technology incorporated under the ""Institutes of Technology, Act 1961"", Counter-claimant represented by Indra Neel Chatterjee , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Counter-claimant, represented by Nitin Gambhir , Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Counter-claimant, represented by Theresa Ann Sutton , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Mandana D Farhang, Counter-defendant, represented by Micah R. Jacobs , Jacobs Law Group SF.
M.A. Mobile Ltd., Counter-defendant, represented by Sanjiv Nand Singh , Sanjiv N. Singh, A Professional Law Corporation.
M.A. Mobile Ltd., Counter-defendant, represented by Micah R. Jacobs , Jacobs Law Group SF.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.
ORDER
Re Docket Nos. 286, 287, 290, and 304
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
On September 30, 2011, the court heard argument regarding: (1) Defendant Partha P. Chakrabarti's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; (2) Defendant Technology Incubation Entrepreneurship Training Society's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and (3) Defendant Technology Incubation Entrepreneurship Training Society's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to the Doctrine...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
