RODGERS v. 36th DISTRICT COURT

Case No. 10-11799.

ARNETTE RODGERS, CARMEN KNIGHT, CARMEN KNIGHT, TAMIE RICH, KATRINA TATE-ANDERSON, JAUNICE FLOWERS, CHERYL SHARPLEY, ANTHONY COOPER, SARAH JENKINS, WENDELL FINLEY, ARECIA STEVENS, CRYSTAL ALLEN-CRUCE, YOLANDA JOHNSON, KEITH CARTER, DORNITA CLEVELAND, ALVITA MOSS, LAURA HILL, and YVONNE MALVAUX Plaintiffs, v. 36th DISTRICT COURT, and MARYLIN E. ATKINS Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

January 10, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnette Rodgers, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Carmen Knight, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Tamie Rice, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Katrina Tate-Anderson, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Jaunice Flowers, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Cheryl Sharpley, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Anthony Cooper, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Sarah Jenkins, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Wendell Finley, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Arecia Stevens, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Crystal Allen-Cruce, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Keith Carter, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Alvita Moss, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Laura Hill, Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Fetter , Miller Cohen, PLC.

Marylin E. Atkins, Defendant, represented by Matthew S. Derby , Miller Cohen, PLC.


ORDER

JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge.

This is a case in which seventeen former employees of the 36th Judicial District Court in Detroit, Michigan have accused the Defendants (the 36th Judicial District Court and Chief Judge Marylin E. Atkins) of violating their fundamental rights under the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution. In their complaint, the Plaintiffs have maintained that the Defendants deprived them of their fundamental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases