1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 798 F.Supp.2d
  5. 798 F.Supp.2d 102 (2011)
 

RUNDQUIST v. VAPIANO SE

Civil Action No. 09-2207 (BAH).

798 F.Supp.2d 102 (2011)

Ewa-Marie RUNDQUIST, Plaintiff, v. VAPIANO SE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 20, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott H. Christensen, Hughes Hubbard & Reed, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Gregory F. Hauser, Wuersch & Gering, LLP, New York, NY, Edward T. Colbert, Kenyon & Kenyon, Washington, DC, Gabriel Amin Assaad, McLean, VA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.

In this case, an international photographer claims that Vapiano restaurants are illegally exploiting her copyrighted works to achieve their chic look. Plaintiff Ewa-Marie Rundquist alleges that Vapiano restaurants in the United States and around the world are unlawfully displaying her copyrighted photographs as a central part of their décor. The plaintiff initiated this case against three corporations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases