1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 804 F.Supp.2d
  5. 804 F.Supp.2d 190 (2011)
 

ISLAM v. CITY OF BRIDGETON

Civil No. 08-1844 (JBS/AMD).

804 F.Supp.2d 190 (2011)

Pamela Windrow ISLAM, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BRIDGETON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

March 28, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Buckman, Esq., William H. Buckman Law Firm, Moorestown, NJ, for Plaintiff.

Robert V. Fodera, Esq., Sharon Handrock Moore, Esq., Gebhardt & Kiefer, Clinton, NJ, for Defendants City of Bridgeton and James Shrader.

Elaine C. Schwartz, DAG, Office of the Attorney General, Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, NJ, for Defendant Van Sant.

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This civil rights matter is before the Court on two motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by the Defendants James Shrader and the City of Bridgeton [Docket Item 52], and Defendant Douglas Van Sant [Docket Item 53]. For the reasons that follow, the motions will both be denied in part and granted in part.

II. BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases